Presented at the 1999 APIII Conference                        Return to 1999 Abstract Index


CREATING A DIAGNOSTIC TRACE: A METHODOLOGY TO STUDY VISUAL SEARCH, KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION AND MEDICAL REASONING IN MICROSCOPIC DIAGNOSIS

University of Pittsburgh
Center for Biomedical Informatics
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Rebecca Crowley, MD

The act of microscopic diagnosis seems mysterious. Somehow the combination of a trained eye, a microscope, and H&E slide produce a classification of disease – an act of paramount clinical importance. But ask a pathologist "How do you recognize that as a case of nodular fasciitis?" and they are likely to respond "It just looks like one!". More introspective pathologists may provide a list of criteria: "It’s composed of spindle cells with a tissue culture appearance". But few will be able to tell you exactly how they searched the slide, selected the areas of diagnostic importance, distilled the mass of visual information into a set of diagnostic features, generated a differential diagnosis, and deduced the correct entity.

Drawing our theoretical framework from the field of human information processing, we are developing and testing a methodology to study these processes. Our findings will form the basis for a model of diagnostic pathology expertise. In future work, we hope to use this model in developing expert systems in pathology, including decision support systems and intelligent tutors.

Our novel methodology combines analysis of videotaped microscope feed, verbal "think aloud" protocol analysis, and automated methods for capturing stage location and magnification over time. Using these techniques we are able to generate:

Data from videotapes and verbatim transcripts are coded and analyzed, and then combined to produce a wide variety of timed and counted measurements. In addition, verbal protocols are used to generate semantic networks that represent the knowledge and reasoning components of this task. By combining all of these data representations, we create a trace of the diagnostic process itself.

Using these techniques, we have completed an exploratory study of a small number of expert (attending) and novice (resident) pathologists. Preliminary findings show substantial differences between experts and novices in terms of diagnostic search patterns, knowledge representations and reasoning.